Is this email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser
Coalition for Marriage

Good news on schools (2): Balance rules could put marriage back in schools

Dear marriage supporter,

Wouldn’t it be great if young people at least encountered the truth about marriage? That’s now much more likely thanks to two new sets of guidance (on teaching and curriculum planning) from the Department for Education.

Throughout history, in virtually all cultures, marriage was between a man and a woman. This unique partnership depends upon the complementary natures of men and women. Young people can have no understanding of our history, laws, art, traditions and literature without understanding that our culture was shaped by people who believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. Millions of people still think it’s wrong to define it in any other way.

Now it won’t be so easy for schools to gloss over these facts and cover only same-sex marriage. New teaching guidance on relationships, sex and health reminds teachers that they must be balanced when teaching about equality issues. This is because Section 407 of the 1996 Education Act requires that where political issues are discussed in maintained schools, “pupils are offered a balanced presentation of opposing views”. The Department says:

“You should be aware that the meaning of political issues does not refer solely to the discussion of party politics. Schools are advised to consider the range of issues on which there could be political views, which may include global affairs, equalities issues, religion and economics.”

The curriculum planning guidance makes the same point in more detail.

For academies and independent schools, the Independent School Standards require the same political balance.

Same-sex marriage is a political issue. A string of legal rulings confirm this.i And the highest courts in the land robustly defend the free speech of people who believe that marriage is only between one man and one woman.

It’s about time our schools did the same!

Young people should encounter what marriage truly means. The new balance rules present an opportunity to make this happen. C4M intends to help.

Parents will be heartened by this news. The guidance should have a real impact.


Yours faithfully,

Colin Hart

Colin Hart
Coalition for Marriage (C4M)

i Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 at para. 65; Raabe, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1736 at para. 221; and Lee v Ashers Baking Company Ltd and others (Northern Ireland) [2018] UKSC 49 at para. 41 where the United Kingdom Supreme Court held that belief in same sex marriage is a political opinion for the purposes of a claim under Northern Ireland’s Fair Employment and Treatment Order.


  Facebook   Twitter   YouTube