“The current Kashmir shutdown, and in particular the turning off of the Internet and communications, is awfully similar to the one in Xinjiang post-2009 riots,” [see CDT coverage] James Millward, a professor at Georgetown University and an expert in Central Asian history, said. “One wonders if [Prime Minister Narendra] Modi is taking a page from the Chinese book there.”
[…] “Kashmir and Xinijang have many parallels,” Ovais Sultan Khan, a human rights activist and director of Future Council, a Delhi-based think tank, said. “Uighur Muslims are facing genocide by the Chinese state, and both India and China are using their own tactics to oppress Uighur and Kashmiri people.”
[…] Not surprisingly, over the past decades, both regions have seen waves of militarism, conflict, and repression. More recently, though, it is the rise of global ethno-nationalism, a phenomenon seen in the West too, that is driving more fierce state-led oppression.
[…] In Kashmir, surveillance technology, some of it possibly sourced from the very companies enabling Chinese repression in Xinjiang, are creeping in. While the Xinjiang model is still the cutting edge of the digital authoritarian state, Kashmir may not be that far behind. Hikvision, a Chinese state-controlled company and one of the world’s largest developers of sophisticated CCTV surveillance systems, had contracts with Chinese police in Xinjiang, and is now exporting technology to India, according to a recent report from the Carnegie Endowment. […] [Source]
Coca continues to note that currently, “the best hope for Kashmir lies in the fact that India has not yet gone as far down the authoritarian path as China. There remains a civil society, albeit one under increasing pressure, some free press, and a supposedly independent judicial system[.]”
The cameras, equipped with facial recognition technology, are being rolled out across hundreds of cities around the world, particularly in poorer countries with weak track records on human rights where Beijing has increased its influence through big business deals. With the United States claiming that Chinese state authorities can get backdoor access to Huawei data, the aggressive rollout is raising concerns about the privacy of millions of people in countries with little power to stand up to China.
“The system can be used to trail political opponents, monitor regime critics at any moment, which is completely against the law,” said Serbia’s former commissioner for personal data protection, Rodoljub Sabic.
[…] While facial recognition technology is being adopted in many countries, spurring debate over the balance between privacy and safety, the Huawei system has gained extra attention due to accusations that Chinese laws requiring companies to assist in national intelligence work give authorities access to its data.
As a result, some countries are reconsidering using Huawei technology, particularly the superfast 5G networks that are being rolled out later this year. […] [Source]
On Tuesday, the U.S. House of Representatives unanimously passed the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act and two other acts that support democracy in Hong Kong, in a rare show of bipartisan support. On Monday night, protesters in Hong Kong had gathered to call on the U.S. government to support their efforts to protect the territory’s democratic rights, as The Washington Post’s Shibani Mahtani reports:
The demonstration, the first approved by authorities since the imposition of an anti-mask ban at all public gatherings, was marked by the sense of anguish that has gripped the movement after months of protesting. Instead of offering any further concessions, the government has instead expanded police powers and imposed more restrictions.
As the crackdown on protests intensifies — with the arrest of more than 2,500, including 201 arrested in smaller-scale protests over the weekend — some see foreign pressure as the best hope for securing a democratic future for Hong Kong.
“Our citizens do not have any kind of power to fight against the government,” said Crystal Yeung, 23, standing among thousands of protesters spilling out onto roads from a small square that couldn’t contain the rally. “We are relying on the U.S. to punish those who are trying to breach the Hong Kong law.” [Source]
“Democrats and Republicans in the House and in the Senate stand united with the people of Hong Kong,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said. “If America does not speak out for human rights in China because of commercial interest, then we lose all moral authority to speak out for human rights anyplace in the world.”
“Today the House is proud to pass the bicameral, bipartisan Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act to reaffirm America’s commitment to democracy,” said the California Democrat.
The bill would mandate an annual review to determine whether Hong Kong’s autonomy from the mainland Chinese government remains sufficient to justify the special treatment the financial hub receives under US law.
[…] House members on Tuesday afternoon also passed by voice vote two other Hong Kong-related measures: a resolution supportive of the protesters and the PROTECT Hong Kong Act. The latter would halt US exports of nonlethal crowd control equipment, such as rubber bullets and tear gas, to the Hong Kong police until an independent investigation into human rights concerns is completed, those concerns are adequately addressed by the Hong Kong government and the White House determines that Hong Kong law enforcement has not engaged in human rights violations for a year. [Source]
All four measures passed by unanimous voice vote, as members of Congress – Democrats and Republicans – said they wanted to take an aggressive stance on China and show support for Hong Kong following four months of unrest in the city.
The measures come as the White House engages in delicate talks with Beijing to resolve a crippling trade war, with U.S. Treasury yields edging lower on Tuesday as investors pared back expectations that an agreement was at hand.
[…] China’s foreign ministry accused the U.S. lawmakers of “sinister intentions” to undermine Hong Kong’s stability and warned that bilateral relations would be damaged should the measures become law.
“China must take effective measures to firmly safeguard its sovereignty, security, and development interests,” ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said in a statement. [Source]
Breaking: Legco meeting suspended 3 min after Carrie Lam entered chamber and met with protests from pro-democracy lawmakers. Pan-dem also projected “five demands, not one less” on wall of chambers. pic.twitter.com/ITy0S9Sv26
Fast-changing geopolitical tensions, growing nationalism and the rise of social media in China have made it increasingly difficult for multinationals to navigate commerce in the Communist country. As the National Basketball Association has discovered with a tweet about the Hong Kong protests, tripwires abound. Take the “wrong” stance on one of any number of issues — Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, for instance — and you risk upsetting a country of 1.4 billion consumers and losing access to a hugely profitable market.
Now, multinational companies are increasingly struggling with one question: how to be apolitical in an increasingly politicized and punitive China.
“You used to know what would get everyone fired up,” said James McGregor, chairman of the greater China region for the consulting firm APCO Worldwide. “And now you don’t know. You just wake up and discover something new.”
[…] Navigating the potential for backlash in China’s commercial landscape now involves managing not just products, but employees and anyone else affiliated with a company. [Source]
He has since clarified his tweet, which is helpful. From his Instagram: "Just to clarify, this is NOT a joke. The government informed our promoters that if they don’t cancel my scheduled shows in China they would pull their cultural permits."
So on the Zedd thing – I have friends in music promotion in Beijing and the last few years have been *nightmarish.* For instance, one venue was told that it couldn't host acts unless it installed, at its own cost, an entire surveillance system hooked up to the police network.
“Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our age,” Wai Chung shouted into his webcam in Chinese according to a translation by site Inven Global. The two casters streaming from Taipei ducked under their desks, saying “Ok, that’s it Blitz bro,” according to the translation. The clip of the incident, as well as the stream of the entire day of play, was removed from the Taiwanese Hearthstone channel, meaning that users can no longer see the footage on Twitch. The clip itself has gained traction on Reddit and Twitter, with many standing by Wai Chung’s message.
In a broader statement to Inven Global, Wai Chung said that his “call on stream was just another form of participation of the protest that I wish to grab more attention.” Focusing on the Grandmasters tournament proved difficult because of his “efforts with that social movement,” and this display might even endanger his “personal safety in real life” but believes that his “actions on stream” stand for something.
Wai Chung has been quiet on social media since the stream and did not respond to a request for comment from Newsweek. [Source]
The two casters who were conducting the interview have also found themselves out of favour with the company, with Blizzard saying they would end the relationship.
The company, in which Chinese firm Tencent has a stake, reportedly issued a statement in Chinese saying: “We will, as always, resolutely safeguard the country’s dignity.”
It may have cost him $10,000 but Blitzchung says he has no regrets; Blizzard, on the other hand, might. The backlash has been swift, with gamers and politicians alike weighing in. There has been talk of a boycott, with #blizzardboycott trending on Twitter, and not just from the average players disgruntled with Blizzard’s actions. [Source]
Gaming company Legend of Legends eSports followed suit by issuing a statement saying players should “refrain” from discussing “sensitive issues” on air.
But other gaming companies took a different tack, with the CEO of Epic, producer of Fortnite, speaking out in support of gamers’ rights to express themselves freely. Makena Kelly reports for The Verge:
Lawmakers, angry fans, and other games publishers all came out with statements and forum posts condemning Blizzard for its decision to ban a player for expressing speech unfavorable to the Chinese government. Epic Games, the developer of Fortnite, told The Verge that it would never ban players or content creators for political speech. In a statement, an Epic Games spokesperson said, “Epic supports everyone’s right to express their views on politics and human rights.”
Epic’s founder and CEO Tim Sweeney took to Twitter later Tuesday afternoon to support his company’s position. Critics were quick to point out that Tencent, a Chinese holding company, owns a 40 percent stake in Epic Games, but Sweeney said that the company wouldn’t influence Epic’s position on political speech.
“That will never happen on my watch as the founder, CEO, and controlling shareholder,” Sweeney said. [Source]
Blizzard users took a unique approach to protesting the company’s actions by turning a game character into an icon of Hong Kong protesters, in an effort to punish the company by getting the game banned in China.
Satirical art, like the Blizzard logo superimposed on a Chinese flag, quickly spread on social media. One viral animation shows a player in a Blizzard video game shooting down a target. Text then pops up on the screen, reading, “Eliminated Blitzchung,” “Eliminated self-respect,” and “Eliminated credibility.”
[…] All across gaming community platforms, players are holding discussions about the intersection of gaming, capitalism and politics. Many longtime fans accuse Blizzard of sacrificing its values to protect business in China. One user pointed out that Blizzard’s decision seemed all the more hypocritical given its most popular games revolve around “the fight against the forces of control, domination, and enslavement.”
There are even hints of possible discontent within Blizzard. On the Blizzard campus in California, where the company is based, there is a statue surrounded by the company’s “core values” inscribed on metal plates on the ground. On Wednesday, former Blizzard employee Kevin Hovdestad tweeted a photo of the “values” plates covered by pieces of paper. [Source]
I’ve seen firsthand the corruption of Chinese gaming companies, and I was removed from a company I founded (after Blizzard) for refusing to take a 2 million dollar kickback bribe to take an investment from China. This is the first time I’ve ever spoken pubically about it.
Meanwhile, Apple came under fire from customers for taking several steps designed to limit access to information for and about the Hong Kong protesters, including removing the Quartz news app from their Chinese store. Nick Statt at The Verge reports:
In a statement, Quartz CEO Zach Seward, who assumed the role of chief executive just two days ago, tells The Verge that “We abhor this kind of government censorship of the internet, and have great coverage of how to get around such bans around the world.” The statement points to the publications’ coverage of VPNs, which can be used to bypass restrictions on accessing certain parts of the internet from mainland China. Quartz also links out to its coverage of the Hong Kong protests.
Apple capitulating to the Chinese government is nothing new. The company’s deep business interests in China, which include a majority of its consumer electronics supply chain, mean that in almost all cases, it abides by the country’s censorship policies and its sensitive reactions to any and all criticism of the Chinese government.
Earlier this week, Apple removed the Taiwan flag emoji from iOS 13 for users in Hong Kong and Macau at the request of the Chinese government, which treats any suggestion that Taiwan, Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau should be considered independent entities as an offense to the sovereignty of the People’s Republic of China. [Source]
Apple also removed the the HKMapLive app, which has been widely used by Hong Kong protesters to track the movements of police, after it was criticized in the official People’s Daily newspaper. In a statement, Apple claimed: “We have learned that an app, HKmap.live, has been used in ways that endanger law enforcement and residents in Hong Kong.” But HKMapLive and others disavowed those claims:
2. There is 0 evidence to support CSTCB's accusation that HKmap App has been used to target and ambush police, threaten public safety, and criminals have used it to victimize residents in areas where they know there is no law enforcement.
So @hkmaplive has shared what purports to be an internal email from Tim Cook to Apple employees. As a user of the app, and an observer of the Hong Kong protests, I would like to address two serious allegations in this email that I believe are false. https://t.co/rLT7xhVO6cpic.twitter.com/YYNwlFGHvP
As the developer and @charlesmok, a Hong Kong legislator, have pointed out, the app aggregates reports from Telegram, Facebook and other sources. It beggars belief that a campaign to target individual officers would use a world-readable crowdsourcing format like this.
The Hong Kong police force is 30,000 strong, one of the biggest police to population ratios in Asia. They do not lack the manpower to patrol a city of 7 million. Rather, they are abundantly present and harass, detain, search and arbitrarily arrest people without warning.
Tencent Holdings, which has invested in several of the foreign companies facing controversy this week including the NBA, Blizzard, and Epic Games, is being criticized by nationalistic Chinese customers for not better managing the companies it invests in. From Lulu Yilun Chen at Bloomberg:
But there’s more trouble ahead: Tencent’s gaming portfolio is spurring controversy too. For years, the WeChat operator took a hands-off approach with the startups and studios across its empire, reaping the benefits of importing Western content and technology for a vast Chinese market. Now the two are increasingly at odds, and Tencent is beginning to realize the downside to its passive approach.
Blizzard’s stern reprimand of the pro-Hong Kong player was popular in China, but drew outrage from the U.S. to South Korea. Online, gamers called for a boycott of the company and proudly posted their cancellations.
Then Epic CEO Sweeney jumped into the crossfire, explicitly giving Fortnite players the green light to discuss politics. The game maker is 40% owned by Tencent, but Sweeney is the controlling shareholder.
His statement earned accolades in the U.S., but was shunned in China. “Tencent why are you not holding your dog on a leash? They are biting you in your face,” one person wrote on Weibo. Tencent spokeswoman Jane Yip didn’t respond to a request for comment.
With its investments in Epic and Blizzard, Tencent has its brand on the line — but little control. [Source]
Steph Curry: “This situation, there’s a huge weight and gravity to it. There’s going to need to be some things to be sorted out. But I just don’t know enough about Chinese history and how that’s influenced modern society…This is not going away. So we’ll come back to it.” pic.twitter.com/6h6ZGWHQtq
Criticism of China’s unfair treatment of American companies has focused on technology transfers, state support of domestic businesses and intellectual-property theft. But Beijing doesn’t just want foreign companies to advance its economic interests. It wants them to advance its political ones, too. In subtle and sophisticated ways, Beijing convinces, cajoles and cudgels American companies to promote the values of the ruling Chinese Communist Party, parrot the party’s views and enshrine self-censorship about China in their corporate cultures. When it’s successful, as with ESPN, the company advances Chinese propaganda.
One way American companies protect the party’s view is by suppressing negative information; Morey did this when he deleted his tweet. So did Activision Blizzard, an American entertainment company that required a professional video gamer to forfeit $10,000 in prize money for shouting, “Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times” in a post-match interview. Beijing does not want to weaken these companies or push them out of China. Instead, it wants them to follow the party’s rules, both in China and globally. “China doesn’t just want you to comply with its wishes,” a Singaporean diplomat told a newspaper last year. It wants you to “do what it wants without being told.” Although Tencent owns 5 percent of Activision Blizzard and ESPN owner Disney has worked closely to mollify the party for decades, it seems unlikely that any Chinese source told officials how to act or which map to use. They had internalized Beijing’s demands.
[…] Chinese Chairman Xi Jinping calls this “discourse power” — the ability to shape the narrative and “tell China’s story well.” And foreign companies and their employees are excellent proxies for evangelizing China’s position. In other words, while the United States excels in soft power, China wins in what we could call proxy power. When Chinese basketball star Yao Ming praises China, Americans expect it. When Houston Rockets star James Harden apologizes for his team and professes that “we love China” and “everything there about them,” that feels heartfelt. Though Harden’s sentiments may be sincere, his contrition advances Beijing’s propaganda goals. [Source]
A bipartisan group of members of Congress sent a letter to NBA Commissioner Adam Silver, criticizing the NBA “for failing to put ‘fundamental democratic rights ahead of profit’ and for being ill-equipped to deal with the foreseeable ‘challenges of doing business in a country run by a repressive single party government.'”
Not only American corporations have faced repercussions in China for their actions or sometimes for the actions of their governments. Some other recent examples:
#Czech president #Zeman announced one hour ago that #China will react to termination of #Prague–#Beijing sister city agreement by diverting Prague-bound direct flights & termination of sponsoring of soccer club #Slavia. It is ironic on sooo many levels.
Lots of you were into this thread about what happened to Lotte in China. I'm serious when I say Korean corporations and K-pop have been dealing with this shit for years. So here is a K-pop example… https://t.co/oIxSRRHfN6