Copy
View this email in your browser
Donate
If you’d like to support this newsletter, click the donorbox button above. Contributions will go to coffee and books, so that I can share more of what I learn about human nature with you.
 
Human nature book recommendations:
https://amazon.com/shop/robkhenderson

 
 
---
 
“Why do authoritarian governments engage in propaganda when citizens often know that their governments are propagandizing and therefore resist, ignore, or deride the messages?”
 
This is from a fascinating paper titled “Propaganda as Signaling” by the political scientist, Haifeng Huang.
 
The common understanding of propaganda is that it is intended to brainwash the masses.

The idea is that people get exposed to the same message repeatedly and over time come to believe in whatever nonsense the authoritarians want them to believe.
 
And yet authoritarians often broadcast silly, unpersuasive propaganda.
 
Huang observes that propaganda might actually be counterproductive, because the official messages often contradict reality.

Why display public lies that everyone knows are lies, and that are easily verifiable as lies?
 
He gives us an answer: Instilling pro-regime values and attitudes is one aim of authoritarians. But it’s not their only aim.
 
Alongside their desire to brainwash people, authoritarians also want to remind them of their power.
 
When people are bombarded with propaganda everywhere they look, they are reminded of the strength of the regime.

The vast amount of resources authoritarians spend to display their message in every corner of the public square is a costly demonstration of their power.
 
Propaganda is intended to make individuals fear the regime, not brainwash them.
 

Long live the victory of the Chinese People’s Volunteers Army!

The message is: You might not believe in pro-regime values or attitudes. But we will make sure you are too frightened to do anything about it.
 
Huang describes how China’s primetime news program, Xinwen Lianbo, is stilted, archaic, and is “a constant target of mockery among ordinary citizens.”

Yet the Chinese government airs it every night at 7pm sharp.
 
The continuing existence of this program is intended to remind citizens of the strength and capacity of the Communist Party of China.
 
Costly endeavors to broadcast unpersuasive messages is a credible signal of just how strong and all-powerful a regime is.
 
In fact, Huang compares this to political campaigns in democratic countries.

Political ads rarely contain new information. They almost never change anyone’s mind.
 
The function of political ads, though, isn’t to persuade. It’s to “burn money” in a public way.

Political ads are costly signals of the political campaign’s commitment and resources.
 

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho; from the movie Idiocracy (2006)

Huang goes on to report the results of his empirical research.

He asked Chinese citizens how familiar they were with the Chinese government’s propaganda messages.
 
He found that people who were more knowledgeable about these messages were not more satisfied with the government.

But they were more likely to say that the government is strong, and were less willing to express dissent.
 
Interestingly, Huang even says that the insipidness of authoritarian messaging is part of the point.
 
He writes, “for this demonstration of strength to be well taken, propaganda may sometimes need to be dull and unpersuasive, so as to make sure that most citizens will know precisely that it is propaganda when they see it and hence get the implicit message.”
 
People are more likely to rebel against a regime when they sense that it is vulnerable. By broadcasting a consistent message repeatedly, the state is attempting to bolster its power.
 
A weak organization can’t produce such messages. They can’t expend the resources.

A strong organization can play the same program every night on all networks.
 
They can broadcast the same message on every website and advertisement and television show.
 
As Huang puts it, “citizens can make inferences about the type of government by observing whether it is willing to produce a high level of propaganda, even if the propaganda itself is not believed by citizens.”
 
That is, even if everyone knows what they are seeing is nonsense, the fact that everyone is seeing it means that the regime is strong enough to broadcast bullshit.
 
People are deterred from dissenting against authoritarians not because they believe in their dull messages but because they believe the authoritarians are powerful.
 

“Young builders of communism! Go forward to new successes in labour and education!” - M. Solovyov (1950)

Moreover, these official messages dictate the terms of acceptable public discourse and drive alternative ideas underground.
 
They habituate citizens into acting “as if” they believe in the official doctrine, if for no other reason than that they do not publicly question it.
 
The political scientist Lisa Weeden, in her study on the cult of Hafiz al-Assad in Syria, has discussed why authoritarian regimes coerce their citizens to engage in preposterous rituals.
 
She notes that, “the greater the absurdity of the required performance, the more clearly it demonstrates that the regime can make most people obey most of the time.”

If a regime can make the people around you partake in absurdities, you are less likely to challenge that regime. You will be more likely to obey it.
 
Of course, this doesn’t mean regimes are not interested in indoctrination.

They would prefer if people really did hold pro-regime attitudes and values.
 
But the purpose of propaganda is not limited just to instilling desired beliefs.

Often, demonstrating the regime’s strength, capacity, and resources to intimidate people is a more important goal.
 
 
Further Reading:
 
Propaganda as Signaling by Haifeng Huang
 
Acting" as if": symbolic politics and social control in Syria by Lisa Weeden
 
 
Recommended Articles:
 
Social Status: Down the Rabbit Hole by Kevin Simler

What Jewel Beetles Can Teach Us About Porn, Men, and Marriage by Rob Henderson
 

My Recent Interviews and Appearances:
 
My Journey from Foster Care to Yale and Cambridge (Cognitive Revolution Podcast)
 
Cancel Culture and Moral Outrage with Dr. Drew Pinsky
 
Luxury Beliefs, Family, and Psychology with Congressional Candidate Jonathan Herzog
 
How Evolution Shapes How We Use Social Media with Matthew Kobach
 
Evolution and the Modern Dating Market (Modern Wisdom Podcast with Chris Williamson)



Thanks for reading, and stay safe
 
-Rob
Twitter.com/robkhenderson

If you’d like to support this newsletter, click the donorbox button below. Contributions will go to coffee and books, so that I can share more of what I learn about human nature with you.
 
Human nature book recommendations: https://amazon.com/shop/robkhenderson
 
The best books I read in 2019: https://twitter.com/robkhenderson/status/1208901345907900416
 
Forward this email to a friend

Sign up for this newsletter here
 
Donate
Twitter
Website
Copyright © 2020 Rob Henderson, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp