Copy
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website or have contacted us previously wishing to be informed of TI publications and/or educational events.
View this email in your browser
Dear <<First Name>>,

We are pleased to inform you that the January - February 2015 issue of the Therapeutics Letter (#93) has been posted on our website: Are claims for newer drugs for overactive bladder warranted?, see summary and link below.  

Last year we marked 20 years since the inception of the UBC Therapeutics Initiative. After the passing of 20 years and the publication of over 90 issues of the Therapeutics Letter we remain committed to our original mission to provide physicians and pharmacists with up-to-date, evidence-based, practical information on prescription drug therapy. Please use the link at the bottom of this message if you wish to support the work of the UBC Therapeutics Initiative with a tax-deductible donation. 

We want to thank you for subscribing to our email list. You can update your subscription preferences here if you ever need to make any changes

Sincerely, 
The Therapeutics Initiative
 
Are claims for newer drugs for overactive bladder warranted?

Therapeutics Letter #93 

January - February 2015
This Therapeutics Letter questions the claims for newer drugs for overactive bladder. Two previous Therapeutics Letters on drugs for overactive bladder (OAB) had concluded that the antimuscarinic drugs (oxybutynin, tolterodine, darifenacin, solifenacin and trospium) had limited short-term potential symptomatic benefit (NNT = 7) and significant risk of adverse effects (NNH = 5). This Letter compares drugs to one another, including newer drugs introduced since 2007, when the most recent Therapeutics Letter on this topic was published.

The Therapeutics Initiative found that all drugs for overactive bladder have limited short-term potential benefit and appreciable risk of adverse effects. There is insufficient evidence that benefits of long-term treatment outweigh harm for any overactive bladder drug and claims of superiority for any antimuscarinic drug over the others are not warranted due to methodological shortcomings of available RCTs. Furthermore, recent observational studies suggest that all longterm anticholinergic drugs increase risk of dementia.  
Read more...
Share
Tweet
+1
Forward
Share
SUPPORT THE UBC THERAPEUTICS INITIATIVE BY MAKING A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION TODAY
Copyright © 2015 UBC Therapeutics Initiative, All rights reserved.
unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences 

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp