View this email in your browser

IBIS  |  Volume 157  |  Issue 1  |  January 2015

The January issue of Ibis contains 12 full papers, including one review paper, 7 Short Communications, book reviews and reports from the BOU’s Records Committee and Taxonomic Sub-committee.



A review of the impacts of corvids on bird productivity and abundance  |  Christine Madden, Beatriz Arroyo & Arjun Amar

Our Review article in this issue is an important assessment of the impacts of corvids (crows and magpies) on other groups of birds. This is an important and potentially controversial contribution, as corvids are often blamed for declining populations of a number of other species, including species of commercial importance, and their numbers are often controlled as a result. In their review, Christine Madden, Beatriz Arroyo and Arjun Amar undertake a meta-analysis of published work, including both correlative and experimental removal studies, dividing their data into studies that assessed the impacts of corvids on productivity of other species and those that examined their impacts on population size. They find that in the majority of cases, there was no evidence for an effect of corvid predation on either measure, though where an effect was found, it tended to be at the level of productivity and not population level. Importantly, experimental studies that removed only corvids were significantly less likely to have a positive impact than those removing corvids together with other predators, suggesting that the impacts of corvids are small compared to other predator groups. The authors conclude that in the majority of cases, though by no means all, corvid removal is unlikely to be a cost effective way of increasing the productivity or populations of other birds.


Low incubation investment in the burrow-nesting Crab Plover Dromas ardeola permits extended foraging on a tidal food resource  |  Giuseppe De Marchi, et al.

The Crab Plover Dromas ardeola is a remarkable member of the shorebird family. Uniquely in the group, it nests colonially in burrows. Giuseppe De Marchi of the University of Pavia and his colleagues investigate the consequences of this habit on the parents’ behaviour during nesting at a colony in Eritrea. Using GPS trackers, they find that during incubation, parents forage up to 26km from the nest and may stay away on foraging trips for up to two days, a pattern more reminiscent of seabirds foraging for their chicks than a wader. However, this did not indicate that birds struggle to find food, since they also spent plenty of time in the breeding colony not feeding, but mostly outside the nest. The authors conclude that the favourable thermal properties of the nest promote passive incubation, allowing parents to forage widely, so reducing competition with other members of the dense colony, and to spend a lot of time outside the nest even when in the colony, making the incubation period safer for the parents.

Assessing the short-term effects of capture, handling and tagging of sandgrouse  |  Fabián Casas, et al.
Fitting tracking devices to birds is increasingly used to answer a wide range of questions in ecology and conservation, but the impacts of these devices on the birds is rarely assessed. In this issue, Fabián Casas of the Spanish Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas and his colleagues assess the effects on post-tagging survival on two species of sandgrouse (Pterocildae). Although they found no impacts on survival in one species, in the other species they recorded significantly elevated mortality in the two weeks after the tags were fitted. Moreover, the authors found a significant effect of both tag weight and handling time; mortality was higher with heavier tags and longer handling time. The authors conclude that tags should not exceed 3% of body weight and that handling time should not exceed 20 minutes if the birds are not to suffer from the process.
A Plains-wanderer (Pedionomidae) that did not wander plains: a new species from the Oligocene of South Australia  |  Vanesa Pietri, et al.
Another remarkable species is Australia’s Plains-wanderer Pedionomus torquatus, an enigmatic quail-like bird that is the only living member of its family. Its closest relatives are thought to be the seedsnipes (Thinocoridae) of South America, but the ancestral roots of the two families are unknown. In this issue, Vanesa De Pietri and colleagues at Flinders University in Australia describe a new genus and species of plains-wanderer from a fossil dating from the Oligocene. They suggest that Oligonomus milleri was a woodland species, and that the extant species’ distribution in open grassland is a derived characteristic, perhaps driven by the spread of grasslands across Australia during the Late Miocene/Pliocene. The age of the fossil suggests a Gondwanan origin for the ancestors of the plains-wanderers and the seedsnipe.

  • Book reviews View
  • BOU Records Committee 43rd report View
  • BOURC Taxonomic Sub-committee 10th report View
  • Issue contents View
Recent posts from #theBOUblog

Wind support makes migrants restless
Cas Eikenaar

Twitter #masterclass 3 - editing and structuring tweets
Steve Dudley

Offshore wind:  the importance of bird density and breeding season definitions
Andrew Tongue

Saving long-term studies
Tim Birkhead

Forest flapper not plains plodder
Vanesa De Pietri & Aaron Flinders

Twitter #masterclass 2 - Stop using auto-generated tweets
Steve Dudley

A tale of two kites
Alex Lees & Robert Martin

Identifying offshore protected areas for seabirds
Gail Robertson & James Grecian

Twitter #masterclass 1 - using #hashtags and retweeting
Steve Dudley


Birds in time and space: avian tracking and remote sensing
31 Mar - 2 April 2015
Leicester, UK
Details  |  #BOU2015 
Making social media and the web work for you

The BOU's Steve Dudley has penned a series of blogs to help you get more from social media, blogging, individual article metrics and more.

Social media is relevant to your research

Making social media and the web work for you

The benefits of blogging about your research

What is Altmetric?

What do you mean you "don't know how to optimise your paper for SEO?"
Copyright © 2014 BOU, All rights reserved.

unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences